Seven new models built off dated CAD, 8.10 – 8.14.
from 8.7.2026 CAD · Mon 8.10
from 4.23.2026 CAD · Tue 8.11
from 8.3.2026 CAD · Tue 8.11
from 8.11.2026 CAD · Tue 8.11
from 8.7.2026 CAD · Wed 8.12
from 7.6.2026 CAD · Wed 8.12
Sanderling 4 · Fri 8.14
| Plan | Ver | Elev | Garage | Material / note | CAD source | Built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tahoma | v2 | T1 | 2c | Stucco | 8.7.2026 | Mon 8.10 |
| Tahoma | v2 | C1 | 3c | Stucco | 4.23.2026 | Tue 8.11 |
| Shasta | v3 | T1 | 2c | Stucco | 8.3.2026 | Tue 8.11 |
| Shasta | v3 | T2 | 3c | Stucco | 8.11.2026 | Tue 8.11 |
| Tahoma | v2 | T1 | 3c | Stucco | 8.7.2026 | Wed 8.12 |
| Shasta | v3 | C1 | 3c | Stucco | 7.6.2026 | Wed 8.12 |
| Siskiyou | v3 | F1 | 2c | Sanderling 4 — first of four | — | Fri 8.14 |
| Chase | v2 | P2 | — | Minor update | — | Tue 8.18 |
| Tahoma | v2 | T1 | — | Minor update | — | Tue 8.18 |
| Chase | v2 | F2 | 3c | Quail Ridge RV | — | Wed 8.19 |
| Chase | v2 | P2 | 3c | Quail Ridge RV | — | Wed 8.19 |
Fence revision — board-to-board corrected to board-on-board. Three scenes re-rendered and sent 8.14.
Recast for who’s actually buying, plus one new scene.
Recast 8.17
New scene 8.17
New workstream, opened 8.17. Two renders done, both views each.
8.19
8.19
8.19
8.19
Sharpening the tools between jobs.
Precision grids for pixel-to-pixel Photoshop overlay — from the Chase v2 F2 build.
DXF only exports from top-of-first-floor upward. Their suggested fix is the Below Grade Render field in the view template, which defaults to None. Testing that.
It existed years ago and was disabled after geometry-codebase changes hurt quality. Experimental and access-restricted now. I offered to take UE5 instead; two of their people are looking into it.
Matt G flagged this independently and I’ve seen it myself. Building from Higharc will be somewhat more labor-intensive, not less — worth factoring into any timeline promised on it.
Started 8.18 · not a deliverable, an argument
Buyers can’t tell a Pahlisch community from a volume builder’s, so they won’t pay a premium to live in one. We use the same tract layout they do. Other developers are doing it better, including NorthWest Crossing here in Bend.
Nothing needed but a read: keep developing this, or park it? The vetted case is standing up as a site — read it here.
Storyboard signed off 8.12. Emailed Todd, Nicole, Torri and you. It’s the only thing between here and animating.
Open since 8.05.
Whether Torri and team want more storytelling for the plan alternates.
I can give a real date once Sales confirms the list. A push from you would speed it up.
Open thread with their support team since 8.14.
Asked the studio that made the Smith Rock 3D model about using it, so a Redmond flyover can show the real landscape. No reply.
Alpine complete, Baker and Jefferson close, Helena / Buckner / Ascent 8.31, Paulina 9.2. Render them early, inside and out, before we hit another logjam. Came out of a chat with Matt G, then emailed to Mike D.
Keep developing it, or park it?